Hard times for "peer reviewed" science

So much of what we depend upon to be "science" may turn out to be nothing more than the old politics as usual tricksters at work. This week the data that formed the support of the hockeystick version of climate change ran into trouble. It seems the "peer reviewers" missed some important problems with the data. The data turns out to be "cherry picked" from a larger set of information. Now the review system must be reviewed. If the suggestions are true then the entire problem of AGW is nothing more than people believing what they read or heard without questioning it. In the meantime the politicians are forging ahead with what may be the biggest mistake ever made. Stay tuned folks this is going to be fun!